Fertility clinic

The Center for Reproductive Medicine

9300 E. 29th St North, Suite 102, Wichita, KS 67226

The Center for Reproductive Medicine reported 377 ART cycles to the CDC for 2022, below the median of 464 cycles among the 5 CDC-reporting clinics in Kansas. For patients using their own eggs, the CDC published a percentage for patients under 35, 35–37 and 38–40; one band has no published rate. The CDC lists embryo cryopreservation and egg cryopreservation among its services. It is a SART member (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology).

CDC 2022 · live births per intended egg retrieval · patients under 35, own eggs

52.1%based on 73 intended retrievalsUS average 49.7%

How to read these CDC rates

  • Most figures are the share of this clinic's 2022 cycles in one age band (counted per intended retrieval, retrieval or transfer, as each row says) that led to a live-birth delivery, as reported to the CDC. The number of cycles behind the headline rate is printed beside it; a rate built on few cycles can move a lot from year to year.
  • A fraction such as “9 of 15” means fewer than 20 cycles; a dash means the CDC suppressed the figure or published none.
  • The CDC advises that “comparisons between clinics should be made with caution. Clinics may have different rates because they have different patient populations or ART treatment methods.” A rate is not a measure of clinic quality and cannot predict an individual outcome.

Last reviewed: Dec 18, 2024, the date of the CDC record these figures come from. Source: CDC National ART Surveillance System (NASS), 2022 Final data, released December 18, 2024. See the CDC's guide to interpreting ART success rates.

Clinic details

Address 9300 E. 29th St North, Suite 102, Wichita, KS 67226
Phone 316-687-2112
Medical director David Grainger, MD
CDC clinic status Open
SART member Yes
Lab accreditation verified by CDC No
CDC clinic ID 846
CDC data CDC data released Dec 18, 2024; fetched Oct 22, 2026

CDC report verified by David Grainger, MD.

Services

  • Embryo cryopreservation
  • Egg cryopreservation

Services are the five the CDC asks every clinic to report. Clinics offer more; ask directly.

Total ART cycles (2022) 377
Fertility preservation cycles (2022) 6
Pregnancies (2022) 124
Live-birth deliveries (2022) 99
Infants born (2022) 105

Success rates by age (2022)

Patients using their own eggs, grouped by the CDC's four age bands. Each cell is the clinic's CDC-reported figure; the smaller “US” line is the national figure for the same cell.

Patients using their own eggs, by age
Measure Under 3535–3738–40Over 40
All patients using their own eggs
Live births per intended egg retrieval 52.1% US 49.7% 27.5% US 36.3% 6.1% US 23.1% —
Singleton live births per intended egg retrieval 52.1% US 46.7% 25% US 34.5% 3% US 22% —
Live births per actual egg retrieval 55.9% US 52.6% 29.7% US 39.7% 6.5% US 26.1% —
Live births per transfer 47.5% US 49.1% 35.5% US 46% — —
Singleton live births per transfer 47.5% US 46.2% 32.3% US 43.7% — —
Average transfers per intended egg retrieval 1.1 US 1 0.8 US 0.8 0.3 US 0.6 0.4 US 0.3
Average intended egg retrievals per live birth 1.9 US 2 3.6 US 2.8 16.5 US 4.3 14 US 12.9
New patients (no prior ART) using their own eggs: cumulative outcomes
New patients: live birth after 1 intended retrieval 50.8% US 53.4% 28.6% US 39.9% 0 of 17 US 25.4% 0 of 6 US 8.5%
New patients: live birth after 1 or 2 intended retrievals 52.5% US 59.6% 28.6% US 47.6% 0 of 17 US 32.7% 0 of 6 US 11.7%
New patients: live birth after all intended retrievals 52.5% US 60.8% 28.6% US 49.9% — 0 of 6 US 13.4%
New patients: average intended retrievals per patient 1 US 1.2 1.1 US 1.3 1.6 US 1.4 1.8 US 1.6
Number of cycles behind the rates (2022)
Intended egg retrievals 73 40 33 14
Egg retrievals 68 37 31 12
Transfers 80 31 9 6

“US” is the CDC national figure for the same measure and group. “—”: the CDC published no value. Its asterisk (*) means a reported sample size of 1 through 4, suppressed for privacy, along with any value that could be used to derive it. A value such as “9 of 15” is the CDC's own fraction: the CDC uses fractions for rates with denominators less than 20. It is not converted to a percentage.

Donor eggs and donated embryos (2022)

By egg and embryo source rather than patient age: with donor eggs, the donor's age drives the outcome.

Patients using donor eggs or donated embryos
Measure Fresh Embryos Fresh EggsFresh Embryos Frozen EggsFrozen EmbryosDonated Embryos
Live births per transfer No cycles reported 5 of 5 US 45.2% 6 of 13 US 45.1% No cycles reported
Singleton live births per transfer No cycles reported 5 of 5 US 42.7% 6 of 13 US 42.8% No cycles reported
Number of cycles behind the rates (2022)
Transfers 0 5 13 0

“US” is the CDC national figure for the same measure and group. “No cycles reported”: the CDC reported no cycles meeting this criterion. It prints 0.0 there with that footnote; it is not a 0% success rate and is not compared with the US figure.

Cycle characteristics (2022)

Context for the rates: how often cycles stopped early, and how much of the clinic's practice is frozen transfer, ICSI, PGT, fertility preservation and gestational carriers.

Share of cycles and transfers, by age
Measure Under 3535–3738–40Over 40All ages
Intended retrievals with no eggs retrieved 3.3% 9.8% 7.4% — 6.4%
Cycles stopped after retrieval, before transfer or banking 2.5% 3.3% 22.9% 10.7% 6%
Cycles for fertility preservation 2% 2.1% 0% 0% 1.6%
Transfers using a gestational carrier 0.9% 0% 0% — 0.5%
Transfers using frozen embryos 98.2% 96.4% 91.7% — 95.7%
Transfers with ICSI 63.6% 58.9% 66.7% — 60.1%
Transfers with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) 49.1% 42.9% 45.8% — 45.7%

“—”: the CDC published no value. Its asterisk (*) means a reported sample size of 1 through 4, suppressed for privacy, along with any value that could be used to derive it.

Reasons patients used ART (2022)

Diagnoses as reported to the CDC; a cycle can have more than one, so the shares add to more than 100%. This is the patient mix behind the rates above.

  • Male factor 24%
  • Endometriosis 14%
  • Tubal factor 16%
  • Ovulatory dysfunction 19%
  • Uterine factor 3%
  • Preimplantation genetic testing 2%
  • Diminished ovarian reserve 19%
  • Egg or embryo banking 40%
  • Recurrent pregnancy loss 12%
  • Other factor, infertility 3%
  • Unexplained factor 2%

What the measures mean

Intended egg retrieval
A cycle started “with the plan to retrieve eggs”, counted whether or not any eggs were retrieved, so cancelled cycles stay in the denominator. Rates per intended retrieval are cumulative: they count live births from every embryo transfer within 1 year after that retrieval, fresh or frozen.
Egg retrieval (actual)
“A procedure to collect the eggs contained in the ovarian follicles.” Rates per actual retrieval are cumulative in the same way but leave out cycles cancelled before retrieval, so they are never lower than the rate per intended retrieval.
Transfer
“Placement of embryos into a woman's uterus through the cervix after IVF.” A rate per transfer counts each transfer on its own, so cycles that never reached a transfer are not in it. It is not always the highest rate: in 2022 the US figure for patients under 35 was 49.1% per transfer against 49.7% per intended retrieval. In the older bands, where many cycles never reach a transfer, it is usually higher (over 40: 25.4% per transfer, 7.7% per intended retrieval).
Live-birth delivery
“The delivery of one or more infants with at least one born alive.” A singleton live-birth delivery is “the delivery of a single infant born alive.”
New patients: cumulative outcomes
Patients with no prior ART, followed through one, two, or all of their intended retrievals, counting transfers of fresh or frozen embryos from those retrievals. This is the closest the report comes to “my chance of a baby from starting treatment”.
Age bands
The CDC groups patients using their own eggs as under 35, 35 to 37, 38 to 40, and over 40, because egg quality falls with the patient's age. Donor-egg rates are not split by age: the donor's age drives them, not the patient's.

Definitions follow the CDC ART glossary and the CDC's guide to interpreting success rates; see the guide to reading the report for worked examples.

Suggest a correction

Moved, renamed, closed, or a phone number that no longer answers? Tell us and we will check it. Work at The Center for Reproductive Medicine? Use the same form to claim the page. Success-rate figures cannot be changed here: they come from the CDC report.

Suggest a correction for The Center for Reproductive Medicine

Nearby clinics

Fertility clinic

Tulsa Fertility Center

Tulsa, OK · 130.7 mi away

Under 35
31.4% (86 retrievals) live births per intended retrieval
Fertility clinic

Mate Fertility

Oklahoma City, OK · 150.5 mi away

Under 35
6 of 16 (16 retrievals) live births per intended retrieval
Fertility clinic

Blue Sky Fertility

Overland Park, KS · 166.2 mi away

Under 35
49.5% (105 retrievals) live births per intended retrieval

More clinics in Kansas

Sources: data.cdc.gov (clinic record, phone, services and clinic profile; fetched Oct 22, 2026) ; data.cdc.gov (clinic profile, cycle counts and cycle characteristics; fetched Oct 22, 2026) ; data.cdc.gov (success rates; fetched Oct 22, 2026) . CDC data released Dec 18, 2024; fetched Oct 22, 2026. Contact details are as the clinic reported them to the CDC for 2022; they were not re-checked with the clinic.