California · CA
IVF success rates in California
California has 85 CDC-reporting fertility clinics in 46 cities. San Francisco has the most with 7. Together they reported 71,539 ART cycles and 13,865 live-birth deliveries to the CDC for 2022.
The table below lists every clinic alphabetically with its CDC live-birth rate per intended egg retrieval in three age bands and the number of retrievals behind each rate. It is not a ranking: small samples and different patient populations make direct comparison unreliable. Open a clinic for all age bands, donor-egg rates and the national benchmark.
85
clinics
46
cities
71,539
ART cycles
13,865
live-birth deliveries
CDC 2022 success rates for clinics in California
| Clinic | City | Live births per intended retrieval, under 35 (2022; of intended retrievals) | 35–37 | 38–40 | New patients under 35, all retrievals | Total cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Fertility Associates Medical Group, Inc. | Santa Rosa | 78.3% of 23 retrievals | 52.2% of 23 | — | 16 of 19 | 181 |
| Alex Steinleitner, MD, Inc. | San Luis Obispo | 43.8% of 73 retrievals | 30.4% of 46 | 18.9% of 37 | 56.3% | 250 |
| American Fertility Medical Center Corporation small sample | Diamond Bar | 5 of 11 | 5 of 8 | — | 5 of 10 | 138 |
| American Reproductive Centers | Palm Springs | 28.6% of 42 retrievals | 5 of 16 | 28.6% of 21 | 0 of 6 | 170 |
| Banafsheh Kashani, MD, Inc. small sample | Laguna Hills | 7 of 17 | 6 of 9 | 5 of 11 | 7 of 13 | 133 |
| Bay IVF Center | Palo Alto | 41.4% of 29 retrievals | 31.8% of 22 | 24.1% of 29 | 10 of 19 | 232 |
| Beverly Hills Fertility | Los Angeles | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 131 |
| California Center for Reproductive Health, Reproductive Fertility Center | West Hollywood | 39.6% of 169 retrievals | 22.3% of 130 | 16.8% of 173 | 45.2% | 1,217 |
| California Center for Reproductive Medicine small sample | Encinitas | 5 of 8 | — | — | 5 of 8 | 94 |
| California Dream Fertility Center | Irvine | — | — | — | — | 38 |
| California Fertility Partners | Los Angeles | 43.6% of 110 retrievals | 28.6% of 105 | 18.6% of 140 | 62.9% | 1,527 |
| California IVF Fertility Center | Sacramento | 45.9% of 85 retrievals | 22.8% of 92 | 30% of 80 | 56.9% | 804 |
| CARE Fertility | Glendale | 35.9% of 64 retrievals | 35.7% of 56 | 25% of 56 | 44% | 478 |
| CARE for the Bay Area | Los Gatos | 35.1% of 37 retrievals | 26.8% of 56 | 16.7% of 36 | 35% | 285 |
| CCRM San Francisco, Bay Area Center for Reproductive Medicine, LLC (BACRM) | Menlo Park | 45.5% of 99 retrievals | 37.8% of 111 | 30.7% of 127 | 65% | 1,242 |
| Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine small sample | Los Angeles | 8 of 18 | 20% of 35 | 20% of 25 | 8 of 13 | 308 |
| Center for Reproductive Health & Gynecology, (CRH&G) small sample | Beverly Hills | — | 8 of 14 | 6 of 15 | — | 197 |
| Central California IVF Program, Women's Specialty and Fertility Center | Clovis | 55.4% of 92 retrievals | 30.6% of 62 | 19.6% of 46 | 58.2% | 397 |
| Coastal Fertility Medical Center, Inc. | Irvine | 31% of 29 retrievals | 18.2% of 33 | 16.3% of 43 | 35% | 327 |
| Envita Fertility Center | Laguna Hills | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 19 |
| Fertility and Surgical Associates of California | Thousand Oaks | 54.5% of 156 retrievals | 39.9% of 168 | 31.5% of 146 | 67.5% | 1,579 |
| Fertility Care of Orange County | Brea | 56.8% of 37 retrievals | 26.2% of 42 | 22.6% of 31 | 70.4% | 334 |
| Fertility Center of Southern California | Irvine | 42.9% of 21 retrievals | 34.5% of 29 | 24.3% of 37 | 7 of 15 | 334 |
| Fertility Centers of Orange County | Irvine | 49.3% of 71 retrievals | 38.6% of 88 | 25% of 132 | 59.3% | 668 |
| Fertility Specialists Medical Group | San Diego | 37.7% of 53 retrievals | 28.3% of 46 | 11.4% of 44 | 47.5% | 666 |
| Gen 5 Fertility Center | San Diego | 9.8% of 41 retrievals | 2.9% of 34 | 3.6% of 55 | 8.7% | 582 |
| Hanabusa IVF | San Diego | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 629 |
| Harvest Fertility | Arcadia | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 11 |
| HRC Fertility-Pasadena | Pasadena | 42.8% of 617 retrievals | 33.2% of 546 | 20.4% of 618 | 53.6% | 5,987 |
| Incinta Fertility Center | Torrance | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 119 |
| Innovative Fertility Center | Manhattan Beach | 21.9% of 32 retrievals | 16.1% of 31 | 12.1% of 33 | No cycles reported | 186 |
| Kaiser Permanente Center for Reproductive Health | San Francisco | 37.2% of 43 retrievals | 39.2% of 51 | 27.8% of 54 | 45.7% | 508 |
| Kaiser Permanente Center for Reproductive Health-Fremont | Fremont | 46.7% of 229 retrievals | 38.3% of 196 | 20.8% of 168 | 54.5% | 1,408 |
| Kaiser Permanente Center for Reproductive Health-Sacramento | Sacramento | 47.8% of 92 retrievals | 31.3% of 83 | 28.9% of 76 | 50.6% | 660 |
| Kindbody Silicon Valley small sample | Los Altos | — | — | — | — | 261 |
| Kindbody-Los Angeles | Santa Monica | 48.7% of 39 retrievals | 39% of 41 | 28.6% of 35 | 62.1% | 909 |
| Kindbody-San Francisco | San Francisco | 46.4% of 28 retrievals | 30.6% of 36 | 34.8% of 23 | 65% | 494 |
| LA IVF Clinic | Los Angeles | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 200 |
| LA/OC Fertility, Inc. | Redondo Beach | 22.2% of 90 retrievals | 14.1% of 135 | 13.3% of 263 | 35.4% | 1,252 |
| Labryo Fertility Center | Newport Beach | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 119 |
| Lane Fertility Institute small sample | Novato | — | — | — | — | 203 |
| Laurel Fertility Care | San Francisco | 37.9% of 103 retrievals | 30.9% of 55 | 20% of 60 | 52.9% | 520 |
| Life IVF Center | Irvine | 28.2% of 372 retrievals | 26.5% of 351 | 15.6% of 475 | 44.6% | 2,385 |
| LifeStart Fertility Center | Agoura Hills | — | — | No cycles reported | — | 10 |
| Loma Linda University Center for Fertility and IVF | Loma Linda | 31.4% of 35 retrievals | — | 23.8% of 21 | 30% | 244 |
| Los Angeles Reproductive Center (LARC) | Encino | 47.7% of 65 retrievals | 36.2% of 47 | 16.7% of 54 | 61.7% | 676 |
| Marin Fertility Center | Greenbrae | 35.8% of 67 retrievals | 33.3% of 36 | 20.5% of 39 | 44.4% | 422 |
| Newport Fertility Center | Newport Beach | 51.4% of 72 retrievals | 29.1% of 55 | 22.7% of 66 | 67.3% | 568 |
| Northern California Fertility Medical Center | Sacramento | 58.9% of 253 retrievals | 41.6% of 178 | 30.4% of 161 | 70.1% | 1,570 |
| Nova In Vitro Fertilization | Mountain View | 55% of 40 retrievals | 54.5% of 44 | 26.9% of 52 | 57.7% | 533 |
| OC Fertility | Newport Beach | 48.2% of 56 retrievals | 43.3% of 30 | 16.7% of 42 | 57.5% | 387 |
| Pacific Fertility Center | San Francisco | 39.6% of 106 retrievals | 38.3% of 107 | 26.4% of 144 | 51.9% | 1,792 |
| Pacific Fertility Center-Los Angeles | Los Angeles | 35.9% of 64 retrievals | 28.8% of 52 | 14.8% of 61 | 44.2% | 1,572 |
| Pacific Reproductive Center | Torrance | 60.7% of 56 retrievals | 42.1% of 38 | 32.7% of 49 | 61.5% | 292 |
| Palo Alto Medical Foundation | San Jose | 57.5% of 134 retrievals | 43.2% of 132 | 36.2% of 105 | 63.7% | 1,121 |
| Reproductive Fertility Center, LinFertility Family Foundation | Irvine | 54.2% of 72 retrievals | 39.3% of 61 | 34.3% of 35 | 62.1% | 1,054 |
| Reproductive Health and Wellness Center | Laguna Hills | 65.5% of 55 retrievals | 34.8% of 46 | 41.5% of 41 | 71.4% | 406 |
| Reproductive Medicine Associates of Northern California | San Francisco | 53% of 351 retrievals | 36.5% of 296 | 21.4% of 210 | 73.6% | 2,653 |
| Reproductive Medicine Associates of Southern California | Los Angeles | 56.5% of 23 retrievals | 53.3% of 30 | 36.4% of 33 | 12 of 16 | 446 |
| Reproductive Partners Fertility Center-San Diego | La Jolla | 54.2% of 107 retrievals | 41.8% of 122 | 32.2% of 115 | 63.9% | 1,043 |
| Reproductive Partners-Beverly Hills, Redondo Beach & Westminster | Redondo Beach | 54.5% of 264 retrievals | 32.6% of 304 | 29.2% of 298 | 62.9% | 2,714 |
| Reproductive Science Center of the San Francisco Bay Area | San Ramon | 53.4% of 444 retrievals | 46.7% of 338 | 31.6% of 323 | 69.9% | 3,207 |
| Reproductive Sciences Medical Center | San Diego | 65.7% of 35 retrievals | 9 of 15 | 23.1% of 39 | 65.4% | 592 |
| RMA of San Diego dba, Pearl Mini IVF small sample | San Diego | — | — | 10% of 20 | — | 257 |
| San Diego Fertility Center | San Diego | 61.1% of 149 retrievals | 44.4% of 160 | 24.8% of 157 | 70.4% | 2,972 |
| Santa Barbara Fertility Center | Santa Barbara | 42.4% of 33 retrievals | 28.6% of 35 | 21.1% of 38 | 46.4% | 279 |
| Santa Monica Fertility | Santa Monica | — | — | — | — | 324 |
| Southern California Center for Reproductive Medicine | Newport Beach | 46% of 100 retrievals | 45.4% of 108 | 29.2% of 144 | 57.8% | 1,080 |
| Southern California Reproductive Center | Beverly Hills | 39.6% of 207 retrievals | 31.4% of 188 | 19.1% of 241 | 48.9% | 2,578 |
| Spring Fertility-East Bay | Oakland | 54.2% of 48 retrievals | 40.3% of 62 | 26% of 77 | 61.9% | 1,353 |
| Spring Fertility-San Francisco | San Francisco | 52.4% of 275 retrievals | 41.3% of 363 | 27% of 389 | 69.2% | 3,059 |
| Spring Fertility-Silicon Valley | Sunnyvale | 52.3% of 88 retrievals | 37.7% of 77 | 24.2% of 62 | 63% | 1,404 |
| Stanford Medicine Fertility & Reproductive Health | Sunnyvale | 34.8% of 210 retrievals | 25.4% of 185 | 16.5% of 182 | 47.8% | 1,344 |
| The Center for Fertility and Gynecology, Vermesh Center for Fertility | Tarzana | 79.5% of 44 retrievals | 41.9% of 31 | 9 of 18 | 80% | 440 |
| The Fertility and Gynecology Center, Monterey Bay IVF | Monterey | 30.4% of 23 retrievals | — | 0 of 19 | — | 137 |
| Tree of Life Center for Fertility, California Fertility Clinics | Tarzana | 43.3% of 30 retrievals | 26.5% of 34 | 23.3% of 30 | 48.1% | 342 |
| UCLA Fertility Center | Santa Monica | 42.2% of 90 retrievals | 42.4% of 66 | 28.4% of 88 | 53.7% | 594 |
| UCSF Center for Reproductive Health | San Francisco | 37.8% of 262 retrievals | 33.8% of 293 | 24% of 458 | 54.1% | 3,473 |
| Unity Fertility Center, LLC small sample | Pasadena | — | — | — | — | 57 |
| University Fertility Center | Torrance | 28.6% of 21 retrievals | 39.4% of 33 | 33.3% of 30 | — | 262 |
| USC Fertility | Pasadena | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 535 |
| Valley Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., West Coast Women's Reproductive Center | Sherman Oaks | — | — | — | — | 49 |
| West Coast Fertility Center small sample | Fountain Valley | 9 of 19 | 7 of 15 | 23.8% of 21 | 9 of 18 | 298 |
| Western Fertility Institute | Encino | 50.6% of 83 retrievals | 49% of 49 | 25.8% of 31 | 59.3% | 734 |
| Zouves Fertility Center | Foster City | 45.8% of 24 retrievals | 29.8% of 47 | 23% of 61 | 8 of 16 | 484 |
| US average (CDC national) | 49.7% | 36.3% | 23.1% | 60.8% |
Listed alphabetically, not ranked. Each rate is the CDC-reported percentage of intended egg retrievals that resulted in a live-birth delivery for patients using their own eggs (2022), with the number of intended retrievals behind it. 10 clinics are marked “small sample”: the under-35 figure rests on fewer than 20 intended retrievals, so the CDC prints it as a fraction.
Why these numbers do not rank clinics. The CDC says that “comparisons between clinics should be made with caution. Clinics may have different rates because they have different patient populations or ART treatment methods.” Small samples swing widely: the CDC notes that if a clinic reports only one ART cycle in a given category, its success rate in that category “would be either 0% or 100%.” Clinics also treat different patients (age within a band, diagnoses, how many patients with a poor prognosis they accept), and those differences move a rate as much as the care does. Use the table to see who reports what, and on how many cycles, then ask each clinic about patients like you. Source: CDC, How to Interpret ART Success Rates.
Cities in California
- San Francisco 7
- Irvine 6
- Los Angeles 6
- San Diego 6
- Newport Beach 4
- Laguna Hills 3
- Pasadena 3
- Sacramento 3
- Santa Monica 3
- Torrance 3
- Beverly Hills 2
- Encino 2
- Redondo Beach 2
- Sunnyvale 2
- Tarzana 2
- Agoura Hills 1
- Arcadia 1
- Brea 1
- Clovis 1
- Diamond Bar 1
- Encinitas 1
- Foster City 1
- Fountain Valley 1
- Fremont 1
- Glendale 1
- Greenbrae 1
- La Jolla 1
- Loma Linda 1
- Los Altos 1
- Los Gatos 1
- Manhattan Beach 1
- Menlo Park 1
- Monterey 1
- Mountain View 1
- Novato 1
- Oakland 1
- Palm Springs 1
- Palo Alto 1
- San Jose 1
- San Luis Obispo 1
- San Ramon 1
- Santa Barbara 1
- Santa Rosa 1
- Sherman Oaks 1
- Thousand Oaks 1
- West Hollywood 1
No city matches. Every clinic is in the table above.
Cities with fewer than 5 clinics have no page of their own; their clinics are in the table above.
Tools and guides
- Success rate lookup - pick a clinic and an age band to see its live-birth rates with the number of cycles behind them.
- How to read CDC success rates - what each row in the clinic report measures and why the denominators matter.
- Questions to ask about costs - a checklist for the finance consult: what a cycle quote covers and what it leaves out.
Frequently asked questions
How many fertility clinics in California report to the CDC?
85 clinics in California reported 2022 ART cycles to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, across 46 cities. Clinics that did not report are listed without data.
Are the clinics ranked?
No. They are listed alphabetically, each with its CDC-reported live-birth rate per intended egg retrieval and the number of retrievals behind it. The CDC itself says that comparisons between clinics should be made with caution, because clinics have different patient populations and treatment methods, and a rate based on a few dozen cycles can swing widely. Clinics whose CDC figure is a fraction (fewer than 20 intended retrievals) are marked as small samples.
Does a higher rate mean a better clinic?
No. The CDC cautions that average chances may not reflect an individual's outcome, and clinics treat different patient populations: age mix, diagnoses and how many patients are turned away all move the rate. Use the figures as a starting point for questions, not as a verdict.